Teaching the millennium generation can be a very challenging job for today’s educators. The students of the 21st century have technology at their fingertips. They live on their cell phones, play video games with constant stimulation and instant results, and are exposed to a social network meeting people all over the world. It’s a whole new way of life compared to even 10 years ago with the rapid ever-changing technology.
As a CST instructor, the biggest challenge for educators is keeping abreast all the new technology. When I adopted my daughters, I took a year off from teaching. I returned to a classroom filled with new technological advances – one of them was the little portable medium called a USB device. In the 11 years as a college instructor, I have lived through at least 6 different versions of the Windows Operating System. What a whirlwind!
From a student's perspective, Joe’s non-netbook video offered some very interesting points on student learning today. Technology has broadened the views of our students. They are not afraid to explore a subject more in-depth because they have the ability via a computer to “click” on an item for more information. This video made a textbook seem very boring and disinteresting to students. If teachers are going to continue to use a textbook, they will need to find ways to enhance the learning to motivate students in other areas. Using an online textbook may be the wave of the future. Not only will students be engaged, but teachers can customize their own book by choosing what they want in an online textbook. In another YouTube video, it was humorous to see a book being depicted as obsolete where the person didn’t even know how to use it.
After studying the 2009 Michigan Educational Technology Standards, I have mixed opinions as to their main objective. Students will benefit from learning the moral and ethical objectives relating to pirating, hacking, cyber bullying, plagiarism, and sexting and the ramifications it can have on their future. However, I feel that the standards are vague and somewhat inconsistent. Some of the very basic principle functions of computers are missing; functions on what an operating system is and how to utilize an operating system by organizing your media. Many students who enter our college classes have a very poor understanding of how to create folders and find files stored on various media. Another issue I find is that many high school students enroll in my software program courses with the belief that they know the program; only to find that they had a very insignificant understanding. Questions that also come to my mind in my own school district are: How does the Bay City School District intend to teach their students these technology standards after they laid off their technology instructors due to budget cuts? Can a general education teacher prepare students for technology in today’s society?
I am glad Michigan has a set of technology standards; however, they need some reconsideration. I didn’t see anywhere in these standards how Michigan is assessing whether school districts are adhering to these standards and are gauging what their students are actually learning when it comes to technology. Let’s face it, budgets are tight; technology is expensive. Government needs to allocate more money to our schools to properly implement these technology standards.
Bibliography
“Delta College Acceptable Use Guidelines.” Web. 04 Feb 2011. <http://www3.delta.edu/AUG.asp>.
“Introducing the Book.” YouTube. Web. 04 Feb 2011. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFAWR6hzZek&feature=related>.
“Michigan Educational Technology Standards for Students 2009.” Web. 04 Feb 2011. <http://techplan.edzone.net/METS/METS2009.pdf>.
“Poll Finds Sexting Common Among Youth.” eSchool News. Web. 04 Feb 2011. <http://www.eschoolnews.com/2009/12/03/poll-finds-sexting-common-among-youth/?>.







